data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14b75/14b75d16ae3a1ea09d8af32c736b14f3e702c158" alt=""
The first example of Lebedev's work is the iconic and beautiful mac os 9 speaker icon speaker. An exemplary piece of mockitecture, it is a model for good looking iconography. The reference is there with out being to forceful. It is still legible, however, because it remains a direct image. The question is: Is it possible for an ambiguous, abstract image to retain the meaning inherit in the orginal object(s)? Can direct iconography and formal references be interesting without ambiguity?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bb34/8bb34e6602159590f48654ba7442f129a5b3da3c" alt=""
Another of Lebedev's designs is the "Fuck the Rain" umbrella. It is a strong message delivered succintly and powerfully to the rain. I'm not sure if the rain would get it, but I do, and I think it is hysterical. From the website:
No comments:
Post a Comment